|
A Reuters/Ipsos poll published Monday, October 12 found that 63% of Americans oppose using prediction markets to bet on US election results. Sixty-five percent opposed betting on US military actions. Opposition ran higher among Democrats at 69% than Republicans at 61%. The survey shows bipartisan public skepticism toward election-linked event contracts as platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket face growing legal and political pressure.
Why this matters?
Bipartisan public opposition gives state attorneys general and federal regulators political cover to crack down on election-linked event contracts. Kalshi and Polymarket are already losing preemption fights in Ohio and Tennessee, with New York's suit against Polymarket still open. The poll numbers arm lawmakers who want to tighten rules without facing voter backlash.
The CFTC's pending swap-rule proposal could force both platforms to restructure or pull political products entirely. Platforms must now weigh whether election contracts are worth defending when majorities in both parties want them gone. The first operator to abandon political markets would signal that public opinion can override trading volume.
The bigger picture
The poll joins a sprint of federal and state pressure on prediction market operators, following the NFL's Supreme Court bid to let states regulate contracts as gambling, the CFTC's swap reclassification proposal, and circuit-court losses that stripped Kalshi's federal shield in Ohio and Tennessee.
|