Legal

Gary Gensler files amicus brief backing Ohio against Kalshi in sports prediction market case

Published Jun 12, 2026Updated 46d ago

Former SEC and CFTC chair Gary Gensler filed an amicus brief on June 11 with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals backing Ohio in its legal fight against prediction market platform Kalshi. The brief, also signed by thirty Native American tribes and eleven tribal associations, argues that sports betting contracts are not swaps under commodities law and that the Dodd-Act does not grant the CFTC authority over sports betting. Gensler called Kalshi's position 'flat wrong' and contended that prediction markets cannot override state gambling regulations, placing federal oversight of event contracts under the Commodity Exchange Act as not precluding states from enforcing their own gaming laws.

Why this matters?

The brief arms Ohio and other states with a former dual-agency chair's authority to challenge CFTC jurisdictional claims, directly undermining Kalshi's federal preemption defense in its fights with Minnesota, Rhode Island, and New Mexico.

The bigger picture

Gensler joins a widening federal-state collision over prediction markets that already has the CFTC suing Minnesota and Rhode Island to block state enforcement actions while Kalshi fights parallel state-court gambling claims in New Mexico.

In this story
Add Prediction News as a preferred source on GoogleGet our prediction-market coverage prioritized in your search results

Related Stories

More in Legal
Legal

NFL presses CFTC for stricter sports prediction market oversight

Legal

Kalshi loses New York preemption fight, appeals to Second Circuit as Washington opens

Legal

Federal judge blocks Minnesota's first-in-the-nation prediction market ban

Legal

Washington judge blocks Kalshi, rejects federal preemption for second time

Legal

CFTC sues Minnesota to block nation's first felony prediction market ban

Opinion

Prediction market volumes climb as insider trading, tax, and regulatory risks mount