Legal

CFTC and DOJ intervene in Rhode Island lawsuit to defend Kalshi and Polymarket

Published May 29, 2026

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission intervened Thursday, May 28 in Rhode Island Attorney General Peter F. Neronha's lawsuit against prediction market platforms Kalshi and Polymarket, filing a motion in federal district court. The agency argued that Kalshi's event contracts are swaps under the federal Commodity Exchange Act and that federal law grants the CFTC exclusive oversight authority over such products, precluding state gambling enforcement. The Department of Justice also filed an appearance ahead of a motion for injunctive relief. The intervention continues a pattern of Democratic state attorneys general taking action against prediction markets, with the CFTC now staking out federal authority in an escalating federal-state conflict over which regulator governs sports-linked event contracts.

Why this matters?

A federal preemption win arms the CFTC's parallel challenges in Minnesota and Wisconsin while deflecting Pennsylvania's separate opposition filing. Kalshi gains institutional backing it lacked when suing Ohio alone last October.

The bigger picture

Brings to three the active federal preemption cases the CFTC has filed alongside Kalshi against Democratic state attorneys general, after Minnesota and parallel to Wisconsin and Pennsylvania enforcement threats.

In this story
Add Prediction News as a preferred source on GoogleGet our prediction-market coverage prioritized in your search results

Related Stories

More in Legal
Legal

Washington judge blocks Kalshi sports markets, rejects federal preemption defense

Legal

CFTC sues Minnesota to block nation's first felony prediction market ban

Legal

CFTC orders Kalshi to honor Michigan trades despite state court block

Legal

Kalshi loses New York preemption fight, appeals to Second Circuit as Washington opens

Legal

Bipartisan Senate bill would ban sports event contracts on CFTC-regulated prediction markets

Legal

Judge Torres denies Kalshi New York injunction, company appeals to Second Circuit