CFTC and DOJ sue states to defend prediction markets as circuit split heads toward Supreme Court
The CFTC is actively defending prediction market platforms against state-level restrictions in multiple jurisdictions. The commission backed Kalshi in an Ohio jurisdictional dispute and sided with the platform against 38 attorneys general in a Massachusetts appeal, according to recent filings. In April, the CFTC and Department of Justice jointly sued New York over prediction market regulations. These actions come as federal courts issue conflicting rulings on state versus federal oversight authority. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently ruled in Kalshi's favor on whether event contracts constitute swaps. With circuit splits emerging, legal observers say the Supreme Court could take up a prediction market jurisdiction case as early as 2027. CFTC Chair Michael Selig, who took office a few months ago, has made blocking state restrictions a priority.
Forces Kalshi to bank on Selig's federal-preemption strategy succeeding before 2027, because a Supreme Court loss would expose the platform to simultaneous enforcement by 38 state attorneys general already lined up against it.