Legal

CFTC and DOJ sue states to defend prediction markets as circuit split heads toward Supreme Court

Updated 21d ago

The CFTC is actively defending prediction market platforms against state-level restrictions in multiple jurisdictions. The commission backed Kalshi in an Ohio jurisdictional dispute and sided with the platform against 38 attorneys general in a Massachusetts appeal, according to recent filings. In April, the CFTC and Department of Justice jointly sued New York over prediction market regulations. These actions come as federal courts issue conflicting rulings on state versus federal oversight authority. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently ruled in Kalshi's favor on whether event contracts constitute swaps. With circuit splits emerging, legal observers say the Supreme Court could take up a prediction market jurisdiction case as early as 2027. CFTC Chair Michael Selig, who took office a few months ago, has made blocking state restrictions a priority.

Why this matters?

Forces Kalshi to bank on Selig's federal-preemption strategy succeeding before 2027, because a Supreme Court loss would expose the platform to simultaneous enforcement by 38 state attorneys general already lined up against it.

In this story

Related Stories

See More
Legal

Kalshi sues Minnesota to block nation's first felony prediction market ban

Legal

Kalshi sues Minnesota to block first US felony ban on prediction markets

Legal

CFTC sues Minnesota and Gov. Walz to block nation's first state prediction market ban

Legal

Trump reverses stance to back CFTC as sole prediction market regulator

Legal

Google engineer Spagnuolo charged in $1.2M Polymarket insider-trading scheme

Legal

CFTC sues Rhode Island to block state gambling enforcement against prediction markets