Legal

Columbia Law analysis says CFTC proposal for restricting some event contracts falls short

Published Jun 16, 2026 Updated 3h ago

A Columbia Law School analysis published June 16 argues that the CFTC's strategic proposal for restricting some event contracts falls short. The piece focuses on the Concerning Event Contract Section, which provides the CFTC with authority to prohibit event contracts on Enumerated Subjects.

Why this matters?

Suggests the CFTC's current framework for limiting certain event contracts may be legally or structurally insufficient, which could force the agency to revise its approach before finalizing rules that would affect Kalshi, ForecastEx, and other regulated platforms.

The bigger picture

The CFTC now faces external scrutiny of its rulemaking logic from Columbia Law while simultaneously battling state preemption cases in New Mexico and Rhode Island, coordinating insider-trading enforcement with the DOJ, and policing Kalshi and Polymarket compliance across multiple regulatory fronts.

In this story
Add Prediction News as a preferred source on Google Get our prediction-market coverage prioritized in your search results

Related Stories

See More
Legal

CFTC proposes 267-page event contract framework permitting sports bets, banning war markets

Legal

CFTC proposes first formal prediction market rules, allows sports bets and bans war wagers

Legal

CFTC sues Minnesota and Gov. Walz to block nation's first state prediction market ban

Legal

CFTC approves first U.S. bitcoin perpetual futures for Kalshi and Coinbase

Legal

CFTC sues Rhode Island to block state gambling enforcement against prediction markets

Legal

Thomson Reuters publishes practical-law guide to federal regulation of event contracts