Legal

Sixth Circuit rules Ohio and Tennessee can regulate Kalshi sports contracts

Published Sep 26, 2026Updated 2h ago

The Sixth Circuit ruled Friday that Ohio and Tennessee may enforce state gambling laws against Kalshi's sports-related event contracts. The decision rejects Kalshi's argument that federal oversight preempts state regulation. The platform must now geofence users in those states. EKG counted $31.1 billion in U.S. sports prediction-market execution volume through September, underscoring the market at stake as states test jurisdictional limits.

Why this matters?

Kalshi now must geofence Ohio and Tennessee users, turning a federal preemption strategy into a state-by-state compliance drain. The ruling deepens a circuit split that already stripped Kalshi of its shield in Nevada and has platforms fighting parallel suits in Michigan, Connecticut, Maryland, and Missouri.

Robinhood and other CFTC-registered venues face identical exposure because the same reasoning reaches any platform offering sports-linked contracts. Legal budgets that could fund product expansion now feed a geofence cascade. Each new state filing fragments the national market further. The Supreme Court remains the only path to uniform rules, but competing Crypto.com and Robinhood petitions are already crowding a limited docket.

In this story
Add Prediction News as a preferred source on GoogleGet our prediction-market coverage prioritized in your search results

Related Stories

More in Legal
Legal

Sixth Circuit rules Kalshi sports contracts are not swaps, lets Ohio and Tennessee enforce gambling laws

Legal

Sixth Circuit rules Kalshi sports contracts can face state gambling laws

Legal

CFTC warns prediction markets to drop American-style moneyline odds

Legal

Crypto.com and Robinhood petition Supreme Court to settle sports event contract preemption

Legal

New York and Polymarket file dueling lawsuits over state gambling authority

Legal

Appeals court says Ohio and Tennessee can regulate Kalshi under gambling laws