Legal

Ho-Chunk Nation narrows Kalshi lawsuit to tribal gaming law after judge allows case to proceed

Published May 22, 2026Updated 62d ago

The Ho-Chunk Nation narrowed its lawsuit against Kalshi to focus on tribal gaming law after a federal judge allowed the case to proceed on Thursday, May 21, 2026, dismissing RICO claims eight days prior. The tribe argues that federal tribal gaming law disproves Kalshi's advertising claims, intensifying pressure on the regulated prediction market platform from tribal gaming interests. The dispute centers on sports prediction markets and tribal concerns, with the case now advancing in federal court as part of broader litigation against Kalshi across multiple jurisdictions involving state attorneys general and tribal nations.

Why this matters?

Keeps alive a tribal gaming-rights argument under IGRA that could force Kalshi to restructure or pull its sports event contracts in any state with federally protected tribes. Any adverse ruling on tribal land exposure could compel geoblocking near reservation boundaries nationwide.

The bigger picture

Brings the running tally of tribal lawsuits against Kalshi to two — Ho-Chunk in Wisconsin and four pueblos in New Mexico — as tribal gaming compacts become the most aggressive front in the prediction platform's multi-jurisdiction legal defense.

In this story
Add Prediction News as a preferred source on GoogleGet our prediction-market coverage prioritized in your search results

Related Stories

More in Legal
Legal

Kalshi loses New York preemption fight, appeals to Second Circuit as Washington opens

Legal

CFTC proposes new event contract rules as Congress weighs sports ban

Legal

Crypto.com's OG sues Washington state in federal court after Kalshi injunction

Legal

Washington judge blocks Kalshi, rejects federal preemption for second time

Legal

Indian Gaming Association lobbies to add sports-contract curbs to CLARITY Act

Legal

Nevada congressmen introduce House bill to ban sports event contracts