Legal

Ho-Chunk Nation narrows Kalshi lawsuit to tribal gaming law after judge allows case to proceed

Updated 9d ago

The Ho-Chunk Nation narrowed its lawsuit against Kalshi to focus on tribal gaming law after a federal judge allowed the case to proceed on Thursday, May 21, 2026, dismissing RICO claims eight days prior. The tribe argues that federal tribal gaming law disproves Kalshi's advertising claims, intensifying pressure on the regulated prediction market platform from tribal gaming interests. The dispute centers on sports prediction markets and tribal concerns, with the case now advancing in federal court as part of broader litigation against Kalshi across multiple jurisdictions involving state attorneys general and tribal nations.

Why this matters?

Keeps alive a tribal gaming-rights argument under IGRA that could force Kalshi to restructure or pull its sports event contracts in any state with federally protected tribes. Any adverse ruling on tribal land exposure could compel geoblocking near reservation boundaries nationwide.

The bigger picture

Brings the running tally of tribal lawsuits against Kalshi to two — Ho-Chunk in Wisconsin and four pueblos in New Mexico — as tribal gaming compacts become the most aggressive front in the prediction platform's multi-jurisdiction legal defense.

In this story

Related Stories

See More
Legal

Rhode Island and Kalshi file dueling lawsuits over sports event contracts

Legal

Kalshi sues Minnesota to block first US felony ban on prediction markets

Legal

CFTC and DOJ intervene in Rhode Island lawsuit to defend Kalshi and Polymarket

Legal

CFTC sues Minnesota and Gov. Walz to block nation's first state prediction market ban

Legal

Wisconsin judge lets Ho-Chunk Nation's IGRA case against Kalshi proceed, dismisses RICO claims

Legal

CFTC sues Rhode Island to block state enforcement against Kalshi and Polymarket