Legal

Forty jurisdictions back states' power to regulate gambling in Kalshi case

Published Oct 8, 2026Updated 40m ago

Forty jurisdictions have joined an amicus brief supporting states' power to regulate gambling in a case involving event contracts on the Kalshi exchange. The brief was filed in Flaherty v. KalshiEX LLC, No. 26-299, at the U.S. Supreme Court on October 7, 2026. The filing argues for federal preemption limits in the context of state gambling regulation.

Why this matters?

A Supreme Court ruling limiting federal preemption could let states impose stricter rules on CFTC-regulated prediction markets, fragmenting the national market for event contracts.

The bigger picture

Forty jurisdictions join the NFL, Ohio, Tennessee, New York, Missouri, and Illinois in a widening state-led push to subject CFTC-registered prediction markets to local gambling laws, deepening the legal fracture that Kalshi and Polymarket are fighting on parallel fronts.

In this story
Add Prediction News as a preferred source on GoogleGet our prediction-market coverage prioritized in your search results

Related Stories

More in Legal
Legal

Sixth Circuit rules Kalshi sports contracts subject to Ohio and Tennessee gambling laws

Legal

NFL urges Supreme Court to classify prediction market sports contracts as state gambling

Legal

CFTC sends White House swap-rule bid to shield event contracts from states

Legal

Kalshi wins Illinois preemption ruling as Missouri order and circuit split pressure Supreme Court

Legal

New York and Polymarket file dueling lawsuits over state gambling authority

Legal

Tribal gaming group condemns four tribes' Kalshi prediction-market deals