Legal

Alito gives New Jersey until Aug. 4 to seek Supreme Court review of Kalshi ruling

Published Jul 2, 2026

Justice Samuel Alito gave New Jersey until Aug. 4 to file for Supreme Court review of Kalshi's Third Circuit win, the first formal SCOTUS filing in the sports prediction market preemption fight. The deadline could set up high court review of the appellate ruling that favored the CFTC-regulated platform. New Jersey is considering asking the court to rule on whether prediction market companies offer illegal, unregulated sports betting.

Why this matters?

A Supreme Court grant of review would move the preemption question from scattered state courts to a single binding federal answer, freezing or wiping out Kalshi's wins in Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota, Kentucky, and Massachusetts. The Aug. 4 deadline forces New Jersey's attorney general to decide now whether to gamble on certiorari rather than keep fighting Kalshi in district court.

Kalshi's legal team must simultaneously defend that Third Circuit victory against New Jersey's potential petition while parrying fresh injunctions and tax demands in other states. A drawn-out docket at One First Street gives state attorneys general more time to secure local bans before any final preemption ruling lands.

The bigger picture

Alito's deadline joins the Kalshi sues Illinois over July 1 tax and licensing and Michigan's fresh injunction as the third state-level action this week testing whether CFTC registration shields prediction markets from state gambling law.

In this story
Add Prediction News as a preferred source on GoogleGet our prediction-market coverage prioritized in your search results

Related Stories

More in Legal
Legal

Ninth Circuit rules Kalshi sports contracts are bets, not swaps, in Nevada preemption fight

Legal

CFTC warns prediction markets to drop American-style moneyline odds

Legal

Federal appeals court blocks Kalshi from Nevada trading in win for state regulators

Legal

Connecticut sues Kalshi to block sports event contracts

Legal

Appeals court rejects Kalshi bid to block Nevada gaming oversight

Legal

Federal appeals court rules states can regulate prediction markets as gambling